Imran Khan Will Be Taken Wherever He Prefers for Medical Treatment
Pakistan is once again in the spotlight over the health condition of former Prime Minister Imran Khan. Federal Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Tariq Fazal Chaudhry has stated unequivocally that Imran Khan will be taken wherever he prefers for medical treatment if and when it becomes medically necessary.
This announcement comes amid rising concerns over the incarcerated PTI founder’s worsening eye condition, with reports suggesting significant vision loss in his right eye, and widespread debate over where and how his treatment should take place.
Parliamentary Affairs Minister’s Stand on Treatment Choices
During a recent television appearance, Tariq Fazal Chaudhry highlighted that the government has no objection to Imran Khan choosing the medical facility where he prefers to receive care whether within Pakistan or abroad.
“The government will send Imran Khan abroad for treatment if necessary, and he can meet any doctor he chooses,” Chaudhry said, emphasizing that medical care remains a priority.
This reassurance came as Khan’s legal team and political allies have been pressing authorities for better access to treatment and specialist care, especially after reports of deteriorating eyesight and other alleged medical concerns.
Rising Concerns Over Imran’s Vision and Health
Recent reports have revealed that the former premier may have lost a significant portion of vision in his right eye, prompting outrage from his party and supporters who claim that necessary specialist care has been delayed or denied. According to medical disclosures submitted to Pakistan’s Supreme Court, vision in his right eye has reportedly dropped to approximately 15 %, raising questions about the adequacy of care provided to him.
Political Reactions and Public Debate
The debate over Imran Khan’s medical treatment preference has not only political but humanitarian implications. Opposition parties and PTI allies have criticized prison authorities for delays in treatment and limited access to specialist care.
At the same time, government officials maintain that all necessary procedures are in place and that if Imran chooses to seek treatment either at Shifa International Hospital, PIMS, or any other facility — inside or outside Pakistan — such preferences can be accommodated.
What This Means for Imran Khan’s Future Care
The government stance that Imran Khan will be taken wherever he prefers for medical treatment marks a significant shift in how his medical rights are being addressed amid political tension. This acknowledgment aligns with both humanitarian principles and legal expectations regarding the health of inmates, especially high‑profile figures like the former prime minister.
It also suggests that if specialist treatment is deemed necessary — including for complex conditions like severe vision impairment — authorities may allow travel to facilities abroad with world‑class care.
International Medical Attention and Potential Abroad Treatment
Given the severity of Imran Khan’s vision impairment and other health concerns, experts and legal representatives have suggested that treatment in internationally renowned medical facilities may be beneficial. Allowing him access to such facilities abroad could ensure advanced diagnostic tools, specialized ophthalmologists, and comprehensive care that may not be fully available locally. Tariq Fazal Chaudhry has reiterated that the government is prepared to facilitate this process if Khan or his legal team requests it, emphasizing that patient choice and medical necessity remain the top priority. This approach highlights Pakistan’s commitment to upholding medical rights and adhering to legal directives while balancing political sensitivities.
Healthcare Rights and National Debate
As Pakistan grapples with political divides, the medical care of Imran Khan has become a national conversation intersecting law, human rights, governance, and healthcare policy. The focus keyword — Imran Khan medical treatment preference — should continue to guide ongoing coverage and public discussion, representing the core topic at the heart of this debate.
By ensuring that medical decisions respect personal preference while addressing medical necessity, the government and judiciary aim to balance legal obligations with public concern — a critical consideration for the well‑being of a former head of government.
